&
Advertise Here with Today.com
 

Aug 19 2008

Blackjack betting strategy: Aggressive.

Published by Z at 3:44 am under Blackjack/21 Edit This

So here’s the blackjack betting strategy that I’ve been using lately, including online, and made quite a bit of cash using.  It is risky, and very aggressive, so if you’re a nervous gambler or sweat the money, it may not be the right strategy for you.

It’s actually a combination of progressive and reverse progressive betting.  Basically, I sit down at the table with $100.  We’ll use the $1 table as an example, since that’s what I was starting at online.

I bet the table minimum ($1).  If I win a hand, I bet progressive.  I go up a little.  Actually, on the first hand, I double my bet (since I don’t like betting change).  If I lose a hand, I double my bet.  So, regardless of the outcome (other than a push), I double my bet after the first hand.  Then, if I win, I go from $2-3.  If I lose I go from $2-4.  I continue to raise in dollar units after winning until I have $10 or more bet, then I go up to $5 chips.  When I get to $50 or more, I go up to $25 increments.  $200 or more, I go up to $100 increments.

 Basically, I keep betting this way (raising a little after a win, doubling after a loss) until the amount that I should be betting is either a) more than I have, or b) more than the table limit.  Most of the time, I wind up losing a little money (between $20-50) in a relatively short period of time.  BUT, because of the reverse progressive, even if you lose a big hand, you can quickly wind up back where you started, and even up.  In fact, a short hot streak using this method definitely makes up for (at least it did for me) the several losing sessions.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Google
  • StumbleUpon
  • TwitThis
Possibly-related Articles:                                        (auto-generated)
Advertise Here with Today.com

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply

Advertise Here
Some Today.com contributors may have received a fee or a promotional product or service from a manufacturer for promotional consideration, while others receive no consideration at all. Each contributor is responsible for disclosing any such promotional consideration.